We’re also broadening our offerings from custom solutions to production-ready or PRO products. Our Pro portfolio is silicon proven in 9 different foundries and 12 different manufacturing nodes. Mixel IP has proven to enable up to 35% reduction in die area and up to 50% reduction in leakage power. The MIPI PHY market is over $300 million per year, and we still have a relatively modest share. We’re positioned for steady growth in this area as we ramp MIPI Pro products, which serve the largest part of the market. Outside of Mixel, Andy Wright, Head of Silvaco’s IP business, has done a great job of increasing our internal capacity for foundational IP elements such as memory compilers and standard cells.
As we look to the latter part of 2026 and into 2027, we see considerable opportunity to grow these areas given our increase in efficiency. Our IP business continues to be positioned as our fastest grower in 2026 and is already almost 30% of our business as we exit 2025. We expect to continue to deliver steady growth in IP sales across interface and foundational IP elements as well as our acceleration in MIPI. This is a story to watch in 2026. Now turning to EDA. We saw a significant decline in our Q4 bookings and revenue after all-time records in Q3. Bookings for Q4 came in at just under $4 million with revenue of $4.4 million.
Here, we continue to focus on shifting priority to a handful of core products that we believe can deliver significant growth. One of these focus areas is Jivaro, which continues to see relatively strong customer interest and has a strong pipeline for new business potential. Jivaro has been adopted by leading companies as it accelerates post-layout SPICE simulations by up to 10x with sign-off accuracy. Jivaro and the other core EDA products are well positioned for growth as we focus development, sales and field application resources on core growth drivers. We expect stability in EDA in the short term and then a return to growth as these new priorities deliver results later in the year.
Underlying this improved business performance are the series of restructuring steps that we put in place almost from day 1. We drove targeted reductions in support groups as well as in product areas to enable the teams to focus on core growth drivers. We also challenged product and support teams to limit direct customer support work done by business unit R&D staff so that they could focus more on product development. This change alone has had the benefit of simultaneously improving our gross margins while increasing R&D capacity. We also put in place leading AI tools to accelerate our software development. We’re continuing to drive other process improvements to continue improving our ability to plan, drive and execute the business.
These changes have been widely embraced across the company, and I look forward to seeing how they continue to accelerate our execution and to delight our customers. And while I’m proud of the team for the significant progress we made in the quarter, I want to reiterate that we still have a lot of work in front of us. In the coming quarters, we expect to build on momentum from the fourth quarter. For example, we’ll continue to deliver significant growth in our IP business. We can already see evidence of this improvement in a strengthening pipeline, which we expect to convert into strong revenue in 2026.
We also see good growth in TCAD as renewals grow and interest continues to increase around our AI solutions. For EDA, we’ll see benefit from our restructuring activities later in the year as we focus on key growth segments. And overall, we expect our AI-driven machine learning capability to change the way semiconductor manufacturing process development is done and to add broad capabilities for fab engineers to improve yields, throughput and failure analysis. As I said last quarter, Chris and I are firmly committed to an aggressive acceleration of Silvaco’s business. We’re off to a good start, but the best is yet to come.
I’d now like to turn the call over to Chris, who will discuss our financial results and our outlook in more detail. Chris?
Chris Zegarelli: Thanks, Wally. Good afternoon, everyone. In Q4, we delivered $18.3 million in bookings near the high end of our guided range. Strength in the quarter came from IP products and our TCAD solutions. IP delivered more bookings in Q4 than it did in the entire year of 2024. IP bookings grew almost 5x sequentially as Mixel started to meaningfully contribute to the business. TCAD bookings were also particularly strong, up 70% to $9.2 million with the close of another AI-driven process development win with a large OEM in Asia. Strong bookings helped propel revenue to $18.3 million in the quarter, above the high end of the guided range.
TCAD and IP revenue grew strongly in the quarter, up 34% and almost 3x, respectively. IP strength was driven by Mixel, while TCAD strength was driven by our latest FTCO win. EDA, on the other hand, saw a significant sequential decline after setting records in Q3. 65% of revenue in the quarter came from license revenue and the remaining 35% from maintenance and service. From a geographic perspective, we saw the most growth in Q4 from the APAC region, which spiked to 57% of total revenue in the quarter. APAC strength was driven by FTCO. Looking down the P&L, GAAP gross margin in Q4 was 83.3% and non-GAAP gross margin was 85.6%.
Gross margin increased roughly 5 full points sequentially and came in well ahead of guidance. As part of our restructuring activities, Wally and I set clear expectations for the field application teams to prioritize customer support, while R&D teams focused primarily on product development. We also drove some reductions in these areas as well. Taken together, these changes resulted in much faster-than-expected improvement in our gross margin. We believe this trend is sustainable. GAAP operating expenses were down almost 8% sequentially to $22 million. Non-GAAP operating expenses were down 5% sequentially to $16.7 million, below the midpoint of the guided range. This result is more meaningful than it may appear.
We think about total spending as the combination of cost of sales and operating expenses. In our business, the majority of cost of sales is the cost of our colleagues supporting customers. From this perspective, our total non-GAAP spending, which combines both cost of sales and operating expenses, trended from $21.3 million in Q3 to $19.3 million in Q4, a sequential decrease of just over 9%. Our guidance indicates that this trend continues in Q1 with a similar level of sequential reduction in total spending. We expect further reductions in Q2. These reductions are ahead of our expectations and reinforce our commitment to driving the business to profitability.
We indicated on our last call that we were committed to reducing annualized non-GAAP operating expenses by at least $15 million annually. We now believe that we will deliver $20 million in gross annualized non-GAAP spending reductions. Our guiding principle remains the same. We intend to turn the business profitable at flat revenue. Achieving this goal will create a strong foundation for future profitable growth. GAAP operating loss improved quarter-over-quarter to a $6.8 million loss. Non-GAAP operating loss was just over $1 million, well ahead of Q3 and ahead of expectations. GAAP net loss in the quarter was $7.2 million and GAAP EPS was a $0.24 loss.
Non-GAAP net loss in the quarter was $0.8 million and non-GAAP EPS was a $0.03 loss. Next, turning to the balance sheet and cash flow. Cash and marketable securities at quarter end was $18.3 million, including $8.3 million of restricted cash due to the Nangate settlement. Given that we have executed cost reductions ahead of prior expectations and given strength in bookings and revenue, our underlying burn rate net of onetime items has declined significantly in Q1. We expect that the $10 million of unrestricted cash on the balance sheet as of year-end will support operations as we drive to positive operating cash flow later in the year.
We expect to approach operating cash flow breakeven in Q2 and to see positive operating cash flow in Q3. Now turning to guidance. For Q1 2026, we expect bookings of between $15 million and $19 million, revenue of between $15 million and $19 million, non-GAAP gross margin of around 85% and non-GAAP operating expenses of $14.5 million to $16.5 million. In closing, we believe that with improved financial discipline and a focus on key growth opportunities, we will set the stage for profitable growth going forward. We would also note that the non-GAAP operating profitability is within the high end of the guided range for Q1, which is ahead of our prior expectations.
And with that, operator, we will now take questions.
Operator: [Operator Instructions] Our first question will be coming from the line of Craig Ellis of B. Riley Securities.
Craig Ellis: Congratulations on the strong execution team. Wally, I wanted to start one — that’s a fairly high-level question for you. When you came in, you outlined a number of growth priorities, and it seems like we’re off on the right foot as we close out 4Q and 1Q. Can you just go into more detail on where you’re happy with the business’ execution and on the 2 or 3 things you really want to see the business execute on as we go through the first half of this year?
Walden Rhines: Sure, Craig. I’d be glad to. And it’s true. I’ve now been here for over 5 months. And I now have a much better perspective on where the opportunities lie, where the weaknesses are and where we need to move ahead. I think the first thing of note, of course, was that we needed more financial flexibility. And so the cost reduction program has been executed well. It’s always difficult, but I think morale has improved greatly. And now after the majority of it is over, people are back to work and thinking about new opportunities.
The survey of all of the product lines was — became more detailed as I — this last quarter, met with customers, traveled the world, Asia, Europe. I spent time with our Mixel employees in Egypt. I spent time in India with new customers. I’ve come to the conclusion that we have an incredible long-term opportunity driven by artificial intelligence and the whole change that’s underway in how process development is done and how wafer fabs engineers and product engineers optimize their processes, optimize their manufacturing, sign defects, look for yield problems. And that, I think, builds well on the core manufacturing capability of Silvaco and provides the long-term growth engine.
The thing that I was particularly pleased by, though, was in the short term, such strength in IP, driven, as Chris indicated, by the strength of the Mixel business, but also the rest of the IP product line as Andy Wright has brought in new disciplines, made it more efficient, greatly increased our capacity and the great marriage that came by joining a well-seasoned significant sales force with a negligible sales force at Mixel has produced a very promising outlook for very rapid growth for the IP business in the year ahead. EDA, while it is down, has selected good opportunities.
Jivaro is a category killer and is, in fact, a sign-off tool, at least one major company and then at a slew of other very leading semiconductor companies. And it’s one of a handful of EDA products that can provide not only the strength of contract renewals going forward, but some potential for growth. But it’s going to be a stabilization issue in the short term and then growth in the longer term.
So summarizing, great long-term opportunity in the evolution of TCAD to the next generation of AI-driven process development, great-looking short-term IP business driven by Mixel, but complemented by the efficiencies in the existing business and a good stable base of key targeted products in EDA, which although they won’t grow in the short term, they provide the strong renewal base of revenue, and it makes me very glad that I joined Silvaco.
Craig Ellis: That’s really helpful, Wally. Chris, I’ll direct a follow-up to you. And it’s in part a clarification and then in part a question. The clarification for the nice Asia foundry FTCO deal. Did that fully rev rec in the first quarter? Or is that a multi-quarter rev rec? And can you provide any color there? And then the second part of the question, love the incremental expense the team is able to achieve going from $15 million to $20 million. Can you give us some color on where you’re realizing that incremental $5 million in savings?
Chris Zegarelli: Yes, Craig, happy to do it. So from a rev rec perspective, on the FTCO win, it was not all recognized in Q4. So a significant amount of it was recognized. The rest of it will run over the term of the contract. And as you saw, good momentum in FTCO leads to good numbers in TCAD, good strong growth sequentially. And as Wally was indicating, we’re seeing incremental interest there, a good pipeline on FTCO, a lot to be excited about as we look at new FTCO opportunities through this year and beyond.
In terms of cost savings, I think we laid it out last call that, obviously, we were incrementally more focused on support organizations, for example, for reductions, but we also did look across the organization to streamline, reset some org structures, for example, and extract some value. I think for me, Craig, and I pointed it out in the prepared remarks, but I want to emphasize it here, some of our spending does go through cost of sales.
So one of the reasons why you saw gross margin perform so well in the quarter and why we think it’s sustainable at these levels is that we were able to have the product teams really focus on product development and have most of the customer support work being done by the field application engineers. And that just leads to a much more cost-effective view on cost of sales. And it also increases capacity on the R&D side where the team can focus more on engineering those new exciting AI-driven products that Wally was alluding to. So I think it was broad-based, a little bit more on the support side. We have been streamlining.
We do think some more cost does come out into Q2. So I can already confidently say there will be a sequential decline again in Q2, and that’s where profitability will be within our grasp after delivering some pretty good numbers here in Q4, and I think a pretty good guide for Q1.
Craig Ellis: Good numbers indeed.
Operator: And our next question will be coming from the line of Kevin Garrigan of Jefferies.
Kevin Garrigan: Wally and Chris, let me echo my congrats on the results and all the progress. Wally, previously, you mentioned the adoption process of FTCO was always kind of a gating factor. Your second FTCO customer was faster than you expected. So are you able to kind of speed up the adoption process? Or what was the driver of the faster-than-expected adoption? And can that translate to other engagements?
Walden Rhines: I think the — our efficiency at closing and ramping FTCO customers is going to continuously increase. The initial engagements were very upfront service-oriented, a lot of bringing the customer online. This particular one was based both on the vision they could see ahead as well as some initial purchases to get things going. And I think in the future, the message is becoming better honed. Our field sales organization is able to communicate the value and the pipeline is increasing for the number of customers.
So I think I would expect that the time it takes to go from initial engagement to real revenue is going to decrease as we move forward and as people see what the benefits are for applying AI to the next generation of processes.
Kevin Garrigan: Okay. Perfect. And then, Chris, can you just kind of give us any color on how we should think about bookings by segment in Q1? Should we expect it to be more kind of TCAD-driven and SIP versus EDA?
Chris Zegarelli: That’s a good guess, and I would agree with that we’re seeing continued strength in TCAD sequentially in Q1. So that’s a very strong story. IP after delivering really good numbers in Q4, it’s in the same range, maybe down a slight tick. And EDA feels flattish sequentially. So yes, a good TCAD uplift in Q1.
Kevin Garrigan: Congrats again on all the results.
Operator: And our next question will be coming from the line of Robert Mertens of TD Cowen.
Robert Mertens: This is Robert on for Krish. Maybe just to go back to the FTCO product, just how you’re thinking about the new customers ramp through the year and your older customer, if you expect any acceleration of orders in calendar year ’26 or more of the upside could be a ’27 story?
Walden Rhines: Yes. Well, if you want me to take that, I guess you’re talking to Chris first. But the way the pipeline is shaping up, we expect it to be a 2026 story. It’s — we have enough additional customers in the queue — and I’d point out that there are 2 elements to this TCAD growth sector. One is the people who are traditional TCAD users. And we have a strong renewal contract — strong queue of contract renewals that provide growth in the base business. The FTCO is really a different thing. It’s how you ship and develop processes in a totally different way. It doesn’t really head on compete with our traditional TCAD business.
It’s really a different business. And as more and more people are realizing that, then it’s not something where we have much direct competition with customers. It’s just a case of selling the value of moving to a new paradigm for process development. And we’re just being helped along a great deal by all the NVIDIA publicity and the people talking about tools, Anthropic, OpenAI and so on where everyone is looking and saying, how is my world going to change. And the people who’ve done TCAD or use TCAD to develop and optimize their processes in the past are asking that question.
And so we just need to be there with an answer that they can act upon quickly, and it seems to be going very well.
Operator: And our next question will be coming from the line of Christian Schwab of Craig-Hallum Capital Group.
Christian Schwab: Solid results. I just have one quick question. Can you give us an idea of what you’re anticipating either percentage-wise or dollar-wise in growth from the Mixel acquisition in ’25 versus ’26?
Chris Zegarelli: I can take that. Yes, absolutely. Feel free to add more color, if you’d like. I mean, as you saw sequentially from Q3 to Q4 from a booking standpoint, IP grew $4 million sequentially. A good piece of that was from Mixel. And if you just annualize that quarterly performance, you can get a sense of what that business is doing, call it, approaching double digits. And then as Wally said, there’s the PRO or Pro products and there’s increased efficiency within the team and leveraging of the sales force.
So we think growth comes from there, but that gives you a sense of the baseline of where they’re coming from and how we do see that growing sequentially into this year and more momentum probably in the second half is what I’d say as we lay the groundwork for really supporting those Pro products that we just recently announced.
Christian Schwab: Go ahead, Wally.
Walden Rhines: And thanks for that growth. Between that and strong TCAD year, we really expect to deliver double-digit revenue growth in the current calendar year.
Christian Schwab: Great. That was going to be my next question. No other questions.
Operator: [Operator Instructions] Our next question will be coming from the line of Denis Pyatchanin of Needham & Company.
Denis Pyatchanin: So my first question is basically about your 3 segments. So performance-wise, what do you think we can expect from all of these in 2026? Do you think you could provide some sort of color that’s either quantitative or qualitative in nature in terms of which ones would do better than the other?
Walden Rhines: Okay. As we indicated in the summary, the really large percentage growth will come in IP. But the core business of TCAD continues, will be strong. It’s a profitable growing business. And so it’s — while not the fastest grower in the coming year, it will grow just as Chris indicated. The third is we will grow less had a record growth this past year, and that’s EDA. So we expect it to simply be stable, a good part of the business, having strong renewals, but the growth of individual products will be slower. So fastest growth, IP, second fastest, TCAD and the new FTCO, which is almost a totally different business from TCAD and then IP third.
I’m sorry, EDA. Yes.
Denis Pyatchanin: No, that’s great. And then so for my second question, you mentioned that you’re going to be doing like an incremental $5 million in annualized OpEx reduction. Can you tell us what is this additional source of savings that you found?
Walden Rhines: Chris?
Chris Zegarelli: Yes. No, I can speak to that. I mean we were always executing this broad streamlining and cost reduction effort within the company. Last call, we said at least $15 million. But as we’ve been working through the synergies, we found some good opportunities in SG&A, for example, to really streamline and kind of focus the team and activities. And we’ve also found some opportunities in selected businesses as well. I think for me, this is all part of the broader strategy of getting the business profitable at flat revenue. You can see with the reductions in OpEx in Q4, which was faster than expected, a continuation into Q1, and it will continue into Q2.
This is just showing that move towards profitability. And then as we hit the growth drivers that Wally was alluding to, there’s a lot of profitable growth that comes from that kind of upside once we kind of get that firm foundation in place. So expect some incremental reductions to go from here. As Wally indicated, most of it has already been executed. There is a little bit more to go, and that’s kind of what you see in the coming quarters in terms of sequential reduction.
Operator: And I am showing no further questions. I would now like to turn the call back to Wally for closing remarks.
Walden Rhines: Well, we thank you all for joining us today. It’s been a great quarter for us, and our outlook is strong and getting very exciting here. So we look forward to talking to you again in the near future. And thank you again for joining us today.
Operator: And this concludes today’s program. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.
Before you buy stock in Silvaco Group, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Silvaco Group wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004… if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $514,000!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005… if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,105,029!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 930% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 187% for the S&P 500. Don’t miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of March 16, 2026.
This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company’s SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.
The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Silvaco (SVCO) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript was originally published by The Motley Fool
